Wendy the wanderer8/3/2023 Clarity is greatly affected.ĭemonstrates thorough engagement in a comment that is detailed, well crafted, and reflective.ĭemonstrates effective engagement in a comment that is effectively crafted and reflective.ĭemonstrates an adequate engagement in a comment that addresses at least one point of an answer to the other student’s response.ĭemonstrates inadequate engagement in a comment that only superficially or tangentially addresses the content of the other student’s response. Unacceptable level of errors in grammar or mechanics. Inadequately meets standards for grammar and mechanics. Response demonstrates occasional errors in grammar or mechanics that do not affect overall clarity.ĭemonstrates errors in grammar or mechanics that occasionally affect meaning. Response is free or nearly free of errors in grammar (including but not limited to use of full sentences and appropriate word choice) and mechanics (including but not limited to spelling and punctuation). Lacks identification and citation of source(s). Inadequately identifies source(s) and author(s) and/or inadequately cites source(s). Cites material from source(s) as instructed in the assignment. Response: Source Identification and CitationĬlearly identifies by title and full name of author the name(s) of work(s) to be discussed. Unacceptable development: Fails to meet at least 50% of the length requirement. Inadequately responds to the prompt with answer(s) that are substantively incorrect, superficial, underdeveloped, and/or reliant mostly on summary, paraphrase, or quotations. Meets or falls 15%+ short of the minimum length requirement. Includes an adequate amount of the student’s own answer(s), but may incorporate too much summary, paraphrase, or quotations or lack a quotation for support. Demonstrates a basic understanding of the text(s) in a developed response to the prompt. Meets or nearly meets the minimum length requirement. Response is comprised primarily of the student’s own answer(s), but is supported by at least one well chosen quotation. Demonstrates understanding of the text(s) in a good, clear, well developed response to the entire prompt. Demonstrates insight and understanding of the text(s) in an excellent, thorough, detailed, clear, and well developed response to the entire prompt. Meets or exceeds the minimum length requirement. Recommended: Write your response on in a word processing document on your own computer, then copy and paste it into the message area of your thread. Use line number(s) to identify the location of your citation. Include at least one quotation from the work in your overall response. In the first sentence or two of your first answer identify the name of the work and full name of the author (if applicable). The word count total (250+) refers to all answers added together. Number your answers (do not copy the prompt into your answers.) Answers need not be of equal length, but all answers must be well developed. If you had to pick your favorite of the three we read, which one would it be? Why?Īnswer each question, unless otherwise specified. Consider the Anglo-Saxon readings from this week and last week.Did listening to the recording help you to better understand the poem even though you did not understand the words themselves? In this recording you could hear the rhythm of the poem and the alliteration of it, and both are representative of the style of Old English poetry. You have listened to a recording of the original Old English of the poem.If one should keep his thoughts to himself, what’s the point of writing this poem in the first place?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |